Thursday, December 31, 2009

Etched Tree 1


Etched Tree 1
Originally uploaded by Katie M 459
Oh this is fun!

I love GIMP. I know I said that before, but I really love GIMP. This was a little more experimenting, and I did this in about 6 steps, I think.

- Opened the original as layers:
November Tree
- Duplicated the layer twice (to be on the safe side).
- In top layer, inverted color and did a Gaussian blur (5.0 horizontal and vertical).
- Set layer mode to "Grain Merge."
- Merged down. Set Color to Alpha Transparency in the Layers|Transparency menu - the transparent color is that grey. You will know "that grey" when you see it. :)
- Added a new layer for underneath, filled with color of my choice (brown).
- Duplicated the top (tree) layer, and set top layer mode to "screen", with opacity of ~50%.

Voila! Took about 20 minutes, and that's just because I was experimenting and didn't really know what I was doing.

I love GIMP. :)

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Christmas Tree - Modified

Another GIMP experiment. If memory serves, this is what I did:

I opened the original photo as layers.
Christmas Tree 12-25-2009 12-44-36 PM

Duplicated the background layer twice. In top layer, inverted color, did gaussian blur, and set layer mode to "Grain Merge." Merged down one.

In top layer, set alpha transparency level and then did a Sobel edge detection. Set original image to invisible. Added new layer, filled with a dark green.

Opened an "Ice" texture I'd downloaded as layers, set above the green layer and below the Sobel layer. Set transparency to ~70%, I think.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Branches At Sunset


Branches At Sunset
Originally uploaded by Katie M 459
This one was fairly straightforward.

Started with an almost identical photo. Duplicated the layer.

In the duplicate, set transparency alpha channel, then used the select by color tool with a fairly high threshold to get the branches. Inverted selection, hit delete.

Created new layer, bucket filled with light blue. Rendered fog (a GIMP render that seems to only be available on my ubuntu netbook, but not on my Windows computer. Odd.) White. On the new "cloud" layer, did some lighting effects with a high glow, low shininess, and a light orange light.

Did fog two more times, these times with low opacity (~40%) and a couple shades of orange and pink. Merged the three fog layers and the blue background layer. Put underneath the silhouette layer, but over the layer that contains the original picture.

Duplicated the silhouette layer, selected by contiguous color (fairly high threshold), inverted selection, and deleted. Repeat as necessary until I have layers that contained all of the branches, but little of the lower area. Merge the branches. Select by color so that all of the branches are selected, select the original silhouette layer, hit delete (this will separate the silhouettes into one layer that contains the branches, and one layer that contains everything else.

In the layer that contains the stuff other than the branches, do GIMPressionist, select the paintbrush04 brush with fairly high numbers for everything. Apply.

Still in the same layer, do a rectangle select, with feathered edges (high number) and rounded edges (high number), select most of the "sky" area, leaving a space around the corners. Hit delete, so that the impressionistic stuff is mostly on the bottom and the sides, and doesn't detract from the branches layer.

Add a border, since if I've learned anything while looking at Flickr, it's that a border makes all the difference. :) Just a regular border, black, X = ~18, Y = ~44. Add another border around that, light blue, X and Y are both 2. Add the text, and save.

Here is the original photo:
Yahara River 11-20-2009 5-26-54 PM

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Portland Trip 5-22-2009 1-33-28 PM Modified 1

It's official... bump and environmental mapping in lighting are my new best friend. :)

Another experiment. The original photo is here:
Portland Trip 5-22-2009 1-33-28 PM

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Swan Ride


Swan Ride
Originally uploaded by Katie M 459
This was manipulated in GIMP for the "Manipulate This" flickr group, which will hopefully let me in soon. :)

Original by monkeywing is here:
Click here to view the original image by monkeywing
(Just in case - this Flickr group is for submitting your photos to be manipulated by other people. Since monkeywing submitted this photo, permission to manipulate is a given).

Here is how it was done:

Added original as layers. Duplicated layer twice - called one copy "swan 1" and the other "swan 2." Through a process too complicated to go into and kind of self-explanatory, selected the big swan in the "swan 1" layer, inverted selection, and deleted to transparency. Did the same with the little swan in the "swan 2" layer. Merged the two layers and called them, "swans" (this layer now contained the swans, and nothing else).

Saved xcf file, deleted the "background" layer, added white layer underneath swans, merged down, saved as jpg. Undo, undo, undo, etc. until the background layer was back.

Opened the new jpg as layers, moved to bottom. Selected swans layer, did Lighting Effects. Environmental map set to the swans jpg, bump map set to the same (depth ~7ish, if memory serves). Played around with the material - low glow and brightness, higher shininess and polish, and metallic sheen. Applied.

Created a new duplicate of the background layer, called it, "water." In the swans jpg layer, selected the white background by color (0 threshold) to get everything but the swans. Inverted selection to select the swans. Selected the "water" layer, hit delete (this deleted the swans, leaving only the water, since selection areas carry over from one layer to another in GIMP).

Did basically the same thing with the water layer as I did with the swans.

Put the water layer under the swans layer, and voila. :)

Yahara River 11-17-2009 3-27-46 PM Modified 3

Hm. Another attempt at not making these manipulations so dark. Played around with saturation of individual colors, and contrast. Perhaps played around with contrast too much. It does look better large than it does small, I think.

See two posts before for indications of how this was done.

Here's the original:
Yahara River 11-17-2009 3-27-46 PM

Yahara River 11-17-2009 3-27-46 PM Modified 1

Another experiment. See the last post for a description of how this was done.

Here's the original:
Yahara River 11-17-2009 3-27-46 PM